The root of the 1% myth

I finally found the research that is behind the statement that 99%, 98%, ‘almost all women’, can breastfeed. It’s contained in a WHO report from 1989.

In the report nearly 4000 women from Nigeria and Zaire, as well as 450 from Guatemala are followed. No lactation failure is observed. You can read it at the link above.

Here’s my problems with the study in comparison to our industrial world.

Ancestral diet: In pre-industrial societies the population is more likely to be eating what they have been eating for the past several centuries. This means allergies are more likely to have worked themselves out of the population. Us in the western world? We’re eating sugars and processed flours and food additives, colors and dyes and flavors, not to mention foods our ancestors didn’t eat.

Genetic diversity: People in the USA, New Zealand, Australia, Europe, the UK and similar countries are less genetically diverse than African populations. However, this African genetic diversity is cluster or tribally based and not the hybrid mix that is found in the Western/developed world. That is, while many variations on the theme of humanity are present in Africa, they are not mixed as much as might be found elsewhere in the world. This means that while the populations are diverse, each individual population has gained genetic stability for issues like tongue tie and PCOS. Possibly to the point that these issues have been, to some degree, bred out of these populations. (See the comments as there are some important clarifications discussed there)

Chemical exposure: In industrial societies we’ve had decades of being exposed to endocrine disruptors, pesticides and industrial toxins. This means we are more subject to the things that go along with that, like endocrine disorders, autoimmune disease, and genetic mutations.

Modern medical science: We now have women surviving childbirth who may not have without modern medicine, and likely would not in a less developed country. The 2005 WHO report indicates a ‘natural’ childbirth mortality rate of 1-1.5%. This includes issues like high blood loss (a factor in lactation failure), postpartum infection (potentially as a result of retained placenta, another potential lactation issue). We also have women conceiving who may not have in the past.

The 1989 study above puts the blame on psychosocial factors for women not breastfeeding and seems to imply that all lactation failure is a result of perceived insufficiency rather than actual issues.  In addition it makes the assumption about the nearly 4000 African women that secreting milk=enough milk to sustain the infant. For the Guatemalan women the 448 are over an 8 year period and apparently all living children were all successfully breastfed. I’ve mused before that the 98-99% is potentially the percentage of mothers unable to secrete milk at all. A figure that meshes well with the ‘natural’ childbirth mortality rate incidentally. Or unable to physically put the baby to the breast due to serious medical issues like postpartum cardiomyopathy.

All of these factors contribute to a higher rate in developed countries. Simply put we are not women living traditionally in Africa. The differences between the populations considered are of considerable significance. The psychosocial factor is of importance, but for those who did educate themselves, did ‘do everything right’ and still experienced issues, it is clearly not the only meaningful factor.

Advertisements
Leave a comment

6 Comments

  1. I find this amusing considering what I just posted yesterday. It’s all about being modern, not diversified. Allergies and PCOS aren’t just “bred out”. They’re created through poor nutrition. You could take an African person in one of those groups, stick them somewhere in Europe and they’ll start to develop health problems.
    http://thelogicallady.blogspot.com/2011/10/down-rabbit-hole.html

    Reply
  2. That’s true. You can look at the increase (or appearance as they don’t have a word for it) of autism in the Somali immigrant population. However, many of these things have an underlying genetic susceptibility that we in the western world exacerbate with food and other living conditions. PCOS is actually thought to be evolutionary advantageous in some ways-when kept in check by an appropriate diet and living conditions. Since PCOS is a name for a collection of symptoms there are definitely aspects of PCOS that are hereditary but not debilitating. I suppose I should say bred out of the null state of the population where genetic susceptibilities are not actively expressed in a debilitating way. Likely 4-5 generations ago us Western Europeans were living in an adapted (adapted because we’d acclimatized to our level of agriculture and what foods were available and things had been relatively stable in that aspect for many generations) null state, but we are not likely to acclimatize back to another adapted null state anytime soon because conditions are still rapidly changing in terms of food development, medical treatments for the ensuing debilitating effects and so on.

    Reply
  3. To some degree yes. In the case of the Somali immigrant population, research hypothesizes that the immigration to the northern latitudes (Minnesota in the US, Sweden etc) and the cultural changes that go along with that (not just food, but being covered more and indoors more) are causing a subclinical vitamin D deficiency that triggers the expression of the condition called autism. Whether that’s through DNA methylation or whatnot is unknown (as to what stage it’s triggered at), but it is hypothesized to be a genetic activation of an inherent potential. Much like some people might have a genetic potential for symptomatic PCOS activated by excessive consumption of refined food products, and the physiological effects thereof, but never come into contact with them, so do not develop any discernible symptoms. That potential is latent in the null state (because it is bred out if and when it becomes active under null conditions).

    Reply
  1. Becoming a pariah: Breastfeeding’s underclass « boobshalffull

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: